Skip to content

Connecting business. Building understanding. Advancing peace.

UAE Law Clarifies Force Majeure Impossibility and Hardship Contract Rules

Under the UAE Civil Transactions Law, contractual disruption is treated under two distinct statutory regimes for impossibility and hardship. Article 236 automatically rescinds bilateral contracts in cases of total impossibility, while Article 224 grants courts discretion to adjust onerous obligations or terminate contracts.

Jurisdiction
United Arab Emirates
Effective date
June 1, 2026
Stage
Final rule
Official document
Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025
Official source
news.google.com
Illustration: A modern commercial law office in Dubai featuring an open legal document binder and fountain pen on a polished dark wood boardroom table
Illustration

Under UAE legal practice reported by Lexology, contract disruption is governed by two separate statutory mechanisms under Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 (the Civil Transactions Law), which replaced Federal Law No. 5 of 1985. The legal outcome depends on whether contractual performance has become objectively impossible or merely onerous.

Under Article 236, force majeure applies where performance becomes impossible in bilateral contracts. In cases of total impossibility, the corresponding obligations are extinguished and the contract is rescinded automatically by operation of law, requiring neither a separate application nor a court order. For partial impossibility, parties may invoke the extinguishment of the affected obligation or petition the court to rescind the contract. For temporary impossibility in continuing agreements, parties may seek obligation extinguishment, contract modification, or judicial rescission.

In contrast, Article 224 governs hardship arising from exceptional, general circumstances that were unforeseeable at the time of contracting. Where such events render performance excessively onerous and threaten serious loss, performance is not excused automatically. Instead, relief is discretionary, allowing courts to reduce the obligation to a reasonable level or rescind the contract, with any agreement attempting to exclude this statutory protection deemed void.

The analysis notes that businesses cannot unilaterally suspend performance without meeting legal requirements. Under Article 232, contract revocation, modification, or rescission requires mutual consent, litigation, or an express provision of law, while Article 234 stipulates notice and court application procedures.

Sources

The UECN Brief

Policy updates, China–UAE business news and industry insights, delivered to your inbox.

Language
Subscriptions

Double opt-in: we send a confirmation link. Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy