Skip to content

Connecting business. Building understanding. Advancing peace.

China Expands International Commercial Courts to Handle Cross-Border Trade Disputes

China has expanded its network of China International Commercial Courts (CICCs) and dispute-resolution infrastructure since 2018 to handle rising cross-border commercial cases. The national-level court has concluded 37 cases worth over RMB 13.8 billion ($2 billion), while 18 local intermediate courts have established municipal-level CICCs. A Jamestown Foundation study notes that empirical research shows mixed findings regarding domestic bias, with factors like state-owned joint ventures influencing outcomes.

Illustration: A modern, formal courtroom interior in an international commercial court building, featuring polished wooden benches, empty judicial dai
Illustration

According to an analysis published by The Jamestown Foundation, China has steadily expanded its international commercial courts and dispute-resolution infrastructure since 2018 to support cross-border commerce and foreign-related legal proceedings. These tribunals handle commercial disputes involving foreign companies in parallel with China's expanding international trade.

By 2026, the national-level China International Commercial Court (CICC) had accepted 46 cases and concluded 37 since its founding in 2018. These matters involved parties from 21 countries and regions, representing a cumulative value exceeding RMB 13.8 billion ($2 billion). Additionally, Intermediate People's Courts in 18 localities—including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Suzhou, and Chongqing—have established municipal-level CICCs, which resolved 1,777 foreign-related disputes and arbitral reviews in 2025.

Regional forums have also reported substantial caseloads. At the 6th Maritime Silk Road Legal Affairs Forum held in Xiamen on September 7–8, officials reported that local CICCs established in Xiamen and Quanzhou in 2022 have handled more than 7,000 cases involving litigants from over 40 countries and territories, with a total dispute value surpassing RMB 50 billion ($7.5 billion).

The report highlights that quantitative research into political partiality in Chinese forums yields mixed conclusions. While the courts do not demonstrate an automatic bias toward domestic parties, factors such as U.S.–China trade tensions and whether a dispute involves a joint venture with a Chinese state-owned enterprise have been found to affect case outcomes.

Sources

The UECN Brief

Policy updates, China–UAE business news and industry insights, delivered to your inbox.

Language
Subscriptions

Double opt-in: we send a confirmation link. Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy